-
<
2/12&13 Weekend Thread Mangini
#3
Posted 12 February 2005 - 07:59 AM
TLL- If you were able to write that live mock draft site, it would have a broad appeal to many, I'm sure. Here's a thought. Instead of having each person be a GM, maybe anyone sitting in on a live draft could vote for who they think the pick should be, and the program picks the most popular pick. It'd be less dependent on having people show up. You would get a lot of traffic and could hold it repeatedly.
Note: I have a project cooking in the BSMW Only folder. Check it out in "The Brucies" thread.
#5
Posted 12 February 2005 - 08:09 AM
Rickkyboy, on Feb 12 2005, 07:31 AM, said:
http://www.boston.co...wks_seek_pioli/
Didn't Pioli say he was staying....hmmm, was he being less than truthful?
#11
Posted 12 February 2005 - 09:04 AM
#13
Posted 12 February 2005 - 09:17 AM
Thats History Pal, on Feb 12 2005, 08:49 AM, said:
I don't know if Rich has children. But doing the links on weekends is a time drain and time you can't get back. To me, after doing links on Saturdays and Sundays for close to a year, it became a drag on my time and it took away from attention to my kids (and also kept me from going to the gym). It's two to three hours plus a day. For Bruce, this is a business and the perspective is a bit different. For Rich, thank you for the tireless ours of linking. Six months is quite a contribution.
#17
Posted 12 February 2005 - 09:32 AM
Quote
If the writer has this right, how is this not bigger news? This is far worse than anything Artest has done (IMO).
Baltimore Witness Intimidation
As much as this pains me to say it, I can't imagine the mileage (sp?) Gerry Callahan would get out of this.
#22
Posted 12 February 2005 - 09:56 AM
rrsafety, on Feb 12 2005, 09:35 AM, said:
If you could take a magic pill and get rid of two non-full time WEEI hosts, which ones would you get rid of? :lol:
Wow, so many choices and so little ammunition.
#23
Posted 12 February 2005 - 10:09 AM
#27
Posted 12 February 2005 - 10:54 AM
Heard on ESPN Radio this morning at 2:00 am: IAL hosting with Jags doing updates.........
#28
Posted 12 February 2005 - 10:57 AM
Quote
The language in Giambi's contract - which has four years and $82 million left on it - says the team may withhold salary from a player for the "use or abuse of any illegal substance, including but without limitation ..." and then goes on to list a variety of examples. It also has a general "other chemical abuse or dependency" clause that gives the team latitude in definition, according to a person with knowledge of the agreement. . .
The fact that they apparently took out the word "steroids" from the standard player's contract is very relevant. If there is any ambiguity as to what the "general clauses" dealing with illegal substances cover, the fact that the word "steriods" was specifically removed strongly suggests that they were not intended to be covered by the contract. Also, the "use or abuse of any illegal substance" clause probably won't help them either, because, if I recall, the "cream" and the "clear" were not technically "illegal" during the time period Giambi has admitted to using them.
This is all just wishful thinking on the part of Yankee aplogists. They are stuck with this guy and his $82 million.
#29
Posted 12 February 2005 - 10:57 AM
charlie, on Feb 12 2005, 08:32 AM, said:
If the writer has this right, how is this not bigger news? This is far worse than anything Artest has done (IMO).
Baltimore Witness Intimidation
As much as this pains me to say it, I can't imagine the mileage (sp?) Gerry Callahan would get out of this.
Somewhat OT, if you like a good police read, David Simon wrote a tremendous book called "Homicide: A Year on the Killing Streets." He followed Baltimore detectives around for a year in the early 90s and chronciled their job. The TV show was based on this book. Baltimore was one frightening place then. And I'm guessing it hasn't gotten much better.
#33
Posted 12 February 2005 - 11:39 AM
charlie, on Feb 12 2005, 08:32 AM, said:
If the writer has this right, how is this not bigger news? This is far worse than anything Artest has done (IMO).
Baltimore Witness Intimidation
As much as this pains me to say it, I can't imagine the mileage (sp?) Gerry Callahan would get out of this.
Charlie, I posted this story about a month ago. I was shocked back then that it wasn't a bigger story. I think that just points out the major problem with the NBA today. This caused zero concern in the NBA world. We're not far from worse things happening on an NBA court someday.
#34
Posted 12 February 2005 - 11:50 AM
Moes Tavern, on Feb 12 2005, 11:39 AM, said:
This helps explain why the NBA is the least liked sport. The NBA now seems to thrive on thugs. The NBA needs more people like Jordan, Bird and Magic.
Great job on Borges, Rich. Its amazing that the three articles he won the award for had nothing to do with the currant Pats.
#35
Posted 12 February 2005 - 12:13 PM
So I decided to do the research on how the "diva" tag evolved, using Nexis.
First mention of Pedro as a diva (I sifted through numerous early articles on how Derek Jeter was dating diva Mariah Carey - heh) was by Bill Reynolds, in the ProJo, June 12, 2001:
Quote
In retrospect, it makes sense. Even then, the Sox were aware they were dealing with a pitcher who had to be protected, like some diva who lives by her own rules.
Second reference was also by Reynolds, Dec 12, 2002, in an article on "most popular athletes in Boston", with Pedro at #3:
Quote
Next 4 references? All Bill Reynolds: Jan 25, Feb 18, April 10, April 29 of 2003. I always thought the Diva nickname started with Shank. I was wrong.
#36
Posted 12 February 2005 - 12:18 PM
Quote
Only a bunch of idiots would continue to put their faith in this chronically overpaid and underachieving aggregation of ill-kempt characters, this wild-and-crazy bunch of hirsute fun lovers who gleefully pop open champagne bottles to celebrate finishing second for the seventh straight season.
Sure, they're loose. They're also losers.
Well, here's his column on the Sox after they were 0-2 down in the ALDS in 1999:
Quote
There's about as much chance of that happening as there is of Reggie Jefferson being named team captain next season.
So bring on the plump diva to sing "Turn out the lights, the party's over."
The Red Sox are done. Their season is finished.
When you're talking about most playoff-caliber teams, Yogi's right: It's not over 'til it's over.
But these are the Red Sox we're talking about.
It's over.
You'd think, having been wrong on one epic comeback he would learn to be a bit more wary. It's not that he gave up on the team: plenty of people did. But to give up in 1999 because "these are the Red Sox we're talking about"??
#37
Posted 12 February 2005 - 12:21 PM
singaporesoxfan, on Feb 12 2005, 12:13 PM, said:
So I decided to do the research on how the "diva" tag evolved, using Nexis.
First mention of Pedro as a diva (I sifted through numerous early articles on how Derek Jeter was dating diva Mariah Carey - heh) was by Bill Reynolds, in the ProJo, June 12, 2001:
Second reference was also by Reynolds, Dec 12, 2002, in an article on "most popular athletes in Boston", with Pedro at #3:
Next 4 references? All Bill Reynolds: Jan 25, Feb 18, April 10, April 29 of 2003. I always thought the Diva nickname started with Shank. I was wrong.
How do you feel about him showing up 10 days early for Mets spring training when he was always late while here?
#39
Posted 12 February 2005 - 12:44 PM
Brian, on Feb 12 2005, 12:21 PM, said:
1st week on the job with a new employer. Of course he'll be on his best behavior.
As far as that whole late-to-spring-trining thing goes, and the diva thing in general, the Sox are just a responsible as he was. Most managers know, an employee will only try to get away with what you let them get away with. A nice stiff fine, or suspension for each day he missed would have done the trick.
#40
Posted 12 February 2005 - 12:45 PM
Miserable Fellow, on Feb 12 2005, 07:59 AM, said:
TLL- If you were able to write that live mock draft site, it would have a broad appeal to many, I'm sure. Here's a thought. Instead of having each person be a GM, maybe anyone sitting in on a live draft could vote for who they think the pick should be, and the program picks the most popular pick. It'd be less dependent on having people show up. You would get a lot of traffic and could hold it repeatedly.
Note: I have a project cooking in the BSMW Only folder. Check it out in "The Brucies" thread.
It actually started last year when Rob Ryan was raided and quarterbacks coach John Huffnagel. Its picking up speed this year.
#41
Posted 12 February 2005 - 12:59 PM
#43
Posted 12 February 2005 - 01:06 PM
Brian, on Feb 12 2005, 12:21 PM, said:
I'll go with what the Gimp said. But I understand people have very different positions on the Pedro issue - not just opposite positions, but a whole panoply of them.
What I was interested in was the way the specific label "diva" crept into use with Pedro - was trying to figure out whether it was a sort of common feeling that arose in people, or whether it was just some people using the label initially and having it stick.
#44
Posted 12 February 2005 - 01:09 PM
Len, on Feb 12 2005, 01:56 PM, said:
Thats the problem with voting for the "Best/Worst" of radio hosts. To be the best, dont you have to be at least.......good? :blink:
#45
Posted 12 February 2005 - 01:12 PM
Brian, on Feb 12 2005, 11:50 AM, said:
I agree that the "Thug Life" attitude that many NBA stars have isn't exactly selling in "Middle America,", but I don't think that is where the NBA is headed.
Since Jordan retired many have commented how unwatchable the NBA brand of basketball had become and how unlikeable many of the stars the NBA was marketing were. I can agree on both counts, however....
I'd put much more emphasis on the "unwatchable" portion of the argument than the "unlikeable". The New York Knicks, Miami Heat, and Detroit Pistons nearly took down the whole league after they had some success by employing defensive strategies that were equivalent to the NHL's trap. It is no mistake that the two leagues that took the biggest hit over the last 10 years were dominated by defenses that were not good for Nielsen ratings, while Baseball's juiced ball era and the NFL kept chugging along.
I, and many other NBA fans, thought Carmelo was much smarter and mature than he apparently is. But, then again these kids make mistakes. Even my namesake was in caught in a bar fight during the playoffs.
So, while I can't disagree with Moe or Brian, I don't think the old rules apply. The NBA is slowly improving, and kids like LeBron James and Dwayne Wade are the future. They are not caught up in the "Be Like Mike" win the game all by myself attitude that guys like Vince Carter and T-Mac have accepted.
It will take time, but eventually even the most ardent anti-NBA observers will note that the NBA will be on the rise again.
#46
Posted 12 February 2005 - 01:16 PM
LarryLegend, on Feb 12 2005, 01:12 PM, said:
Since Jordan retired many have commented how unwatchable the NBA brand of basketball had become and how unlikeable many of the stars the NBA was marketing were. I can agree on both counts, however....
I'd put much more emphasis on the "unwatchable" portion of the argument than the "unlikeable". The New York Knicks, Miami Heat, and Detroit Pistons nearly took down the whole league after they had some success by employing defensive strategies that were equivalent to the NHL's trap. It is no mistake that the two leagues that took the biggest hit over the last 10 years were dominated by defenses that were not good for Nielsen ratings, while Baseball's juiced ball era and the NFL kept chugging along.
I, and many other NBA fans, thought Carmelo was much smarter and mature than he apparently is. But, then again these kids make mistakes. Even my namesake was in caught in a bar fight during the playoffs.
So, while I can't disagree with Moe or Brian, I don't think the old rules apply. The NBA is slowly improving, and kids like LeBron James and Dwayne Wade are the future. They are not caught up in the "Be Like Mike" win the game all by myself attitude that guys like Vince Carter and T-Mac have accepted.
It will take time, but eventually even the most ardent anti-NBA observers will note that the NBA will be on the rise again.
I'm a little afraid to reply to a basketball post. :lol: However, there's a book coming out in the next few weeks about how the hip-hop culture took over the NBA. If you go to the BSMW store and check out the new/coming soon category, it's listed in there. (cheap plug)
#48
Posted 12 February 2005 - 01:23 PM
LarryLegend, on Feb 12 2005, 01:12 PM, said:
Since Jordan retired many have commented how unwatchable the NBA brand of basketball had become and how unlikeable many of the stars the NBA was marketing were. I can agree on both counts, however....
I'd put much more emphasis on the "unwatchable" portion of the argument than the "unlikeable". The New York Knicks, Miami Heat, and Detroit Pistons nearly took down the whole league after they had some success by employing defensive strategies that were equivalent to the NHL's trap. It is no mistake that the two leagues that took the biggest hit over the last 10 years were dominated by defenses that were not good for Nielsen ratings, while Baseball's juiced ball era and the NFL kept chugging along.
I, and many other NBA fans, thought Carmelo was much smarter and mature than he apparently is. But, then again these kids make mistakes. Even my namesake was in caught in a bar fight during the playoffs.
So, while I can't disagree with Moe or Brian, I don't think the old rules apply. The NBA is slowly improving, and kids like LeBron James and Dwayne Wade are the future. They are not caught up in the "Be Like Mike" win the game all by myself attitude that guys like Vince Carter and T-Mac have accepted.
It will take time, but eventually even the most ardent anti-NBA observers will note that the NBA will be on the rise again.
"Thug Life NBA?"
Rae Carruth and Ray Lewis and OJ want their doo-rags back.
Regardless of the rest of the nation, the reason the NBA doesn't get any "burn" in this city is cause WEEI got boned when the Celts didn't re-up with them.
Screw the big picture, Pete fat-azz & Company would be drooling all over themselves if they hosted the games.
Long live Ryen R!
#49
Posted 12 February 2005 - 01:28 PM
Quote
It would seem like Patriots Pro Bowl quarterback Tom Brady has the life, wouldn't it? Three Super Bowls. Millions in the bank. Hollywood looks to go along with a Hollywood girlfriend.
And that's what I thought, Brady has the life.
Until I spoke with Brady after he arrived in Hawaii.
Tom Brady's charmed life can be exhausting.
Brady looked worn out. He sounded worn out. He was worn out. My guess is that Brady would be happy to crawl out of his skin for a few weeks, head off to a place somewhere in Europe where very few people would recognize him, and disappear from the world he has created.
In his world, there's too much fuss, too much attention, too much spotlight, too much demands, too much of everything and not enough privacy and rest.
Getting those things would mean more to him, far more to him, than any signing bonus the Patriots might reward him with this offseason.

Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote